Historiese korrektheid en historiese fiksie: 'n Respons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4314/tvl.v52i2.6Keywords:
aesthetic illusion, historical fiction, history fiction, verisimilitudeAbstract
In this article the relationship between history and fiction is examined in response to the historian, Fransjohan Pretorius' criticism of recent Afrikaans fiction about the Anglo-Boer War in Tydskrif vir Letterkunde 52.2 (2015). The intricate relationship between history and fiction is examined by pointing, on the one hand to the problematic of the relationship between history and the past and on the one hand, to the difference between fiction and history. The function of aesthetic illusion, verisimilitude and conceptions of reference is investigated theoretically before turning to the specific novels that Pretorius discusses. The article shows that historical fiction cannot be restricted to novelized versions of accepted history, but that historical fiction also reminds the reader that the past is always culturally mediated and that the primary aim of novels is not to represent the past but to examine aspects of human existence. A comparison between fiction and history can therefore not be used as a norm to assess novels.
Downloads
References
Coetzee, Christoffel. Op soek na generaal Mannetjies Mentz. Kaapstad: Queillerie, 1998.
Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. Londen, New York: Routledge, 1989.
Jenkins, K. Rethinking History. Londen: Routledge, 1991.
Klauk, Tobias en Köppe, Tilmann. “Showing vs. Telling.” The Living Handbook of Narratology. Reds. Peter
Hühn, et al. Hamburg: Hamburg University. 16 Jan. 2014. 30 Apr. 2015. <http://www.lhn.unihamburg.de/article/telling-vs-showing>.
Kundera, Milan. Testaments Betrayed. Londen: Faber & Faber, 1996.
Kundera, Milan. The Art of the Novel. Londen: Faber & Faber, 1988.
Mar, Raymond, Keith Oatley, Jacob Hirsh, Jennifer dela Paz en Jordan B. Peterson. “Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to Fiction versus Non-Fiction, Divergent Associations with Social Ability, and the Simulation of Fictional Social Worlds.” Journal of Research in Personality 40 (2006): 694–712.
Pavel, Thomas. Fictional Worlds. Cambridge: Havard UP, 1986.
Pavel, Thomas. “The Borders of Fiction”. Poetics Today 4.1 (1983): 83–88.
Pavel, Thomas. The Lives of the Novel. A History. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2013.
Pretorius, Fransjohan. “Historisiteit van resente historiese fiksie oor die Anglo-Boereoorlog in Afrikaans.” Tydskrif vir Letterkunde 52.2 (2015): 61–77.
Prince, Gerald. Dictionary of Narratology. Revised Edition. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2003.
Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Vol I. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative Vol 3. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.
Schoeman, Karel. Verliesfontein. Kaapstad: Human & Rousseau, 1998.
Ulaby, Neda. “The Man Who Gets The Science Right On ‘The Big Bang Theory.” 23 Sept. 2013. 30 Apr. 2015. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2013/09/23/224404260/the-man-who-gets-the-scienceright-on-the-big-bang-theory>.
White, Hayden. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” W. J. T. Mitchell, On Narrative. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. 1–23.
White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P. 1978.
Winterbach, Ingrid. Die aanspraak van lewende wesens. Kaapstad: Human & Rousseau, 2012.
Winterbach, Ingrid. Die boek van toeval en toeverlaat. Kaapstad: Human & Rousseau, 2006.
Winterbach, Ingrid. Niggie. Kaapstad: Human & Rousseau, 2002.
Wolf, Werner. “Illusion (Aesthetic).” The Living Handbook of Narratology. Reds. Peter Hühn, et al. Hamburg: Hamburg University. 17 Jan. 2014. 24 Nov. 2014. <http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/illusionaesthetic>.
Wolfe, Tom. Hooking Up. Londen: Jonathan Cape, 2000.
Wood, James. How Fiction Works. Londen: Picador, 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Tydskrif vir Letterkunde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.