Land, botho and identity in Thomas Mofolo's novels

Auteurs

  • Limakatso Chaka National University of Lesotho, Roma, Lesotho

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.17159/tvl.v.53i2.5

Mots-clés :

botho, nationhood, self-identification, Thomas Mofolo

Résumé

Mofolo's novel Pitseng (1910) (Pitseng: The search for true love) is a conversion narrative which deals with the transition of society from tradition to modernity. The author utilises a double quest narrative and a love story to represent major challenges facing the Basotho nation of the colonial epoch. The protagonist Katse is an evangelist who brings literacy and Christianity to the Pitseng valley where his predecessors have failed because of their lack of compassion for rural society. Katse's success is based on his humanistic approach to the Christian message. He becomes a role model for two young Christians, Alfred Phakoe and Aria Sebaka, who marry through his influence and become members of the future elite of a nascent modern Lesotho. The intention of this article is to demonstrate the link between Lesotho's social history and the manner in which Mofolo represents the landscape, language, culture, religion and national history in his work to forge a positive image of a na- tion arguing for economic and political autonomy. Mofolo's writing relies heavily on history and various discourses of the 1880s and the early 1900s to create a historically meaningful text which brings to light the interconnectedness between the real and the fictive.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

  • Limakatso Chaka, National University of Lesotho, Roma, Lesotho

    Limakatso Chaka is a lecturer in French at the National University of Lesotho where her research focus includes Sesotho literature and French translation of Sesotho literature.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2016-09-01

Numéro

Rubrique

Research articles

Comment citer

Chaka, L. (2016). Land, botho and identity in Thomas Mofolo’s novels. Tydskrif Vir Letterkunde, 53(2), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.17159/tvl.v.53i2.5